Perpetual, Printing, Science & Technology, Top StoriesPerpetual Printing
Printing has come an extended manner because the pc landed at the laptop. First, there were daisy-wheel printers, then dot-matrix printers, then inkjet and laser printers. The problem with all of those
output gadgets, of route, is that they require paper -- lots of it -- and steeply-priced consumables, like toner. Why can not someone invent an inkless, tonerless printer that allows the operator to reuse paper?
As it turns out, this isn't a new concept. Xerox has been working with so-called digital paper because the 1970s. Its most promising solution is a form of paper called "Gyricon." A Gyricon sheet is a thin layer of obvious plastic containing millions of small oil-filled cavities. A -colored bead is loose to rotate internal each hollow space. When a printer applies a voltage to the surface of the sheet, the beads rotate to present one colored aspect to the viewer, presenting the ability to create textual content or pictures. The snap shots will remain on the paper till it's fed via the printer yet again.
A Japanese agency, Sanwa Newtec, is imparting its version of inkless, tonerless and rewritable printing technology. Its product is known as the PrePeat rewritable printer, which, like the Xerox solution, calls for plastic paper. But PrePeat uses a one of a kind method to provide an photograph. Each sheet of paper comes embedded with leuco dyes, which alternate colour with temperature -- colored while cool and clean when hot. The PrePeat printer, then, heats and cools the paper to first erase an photograph after which create a new photograph in its place. According to the enterprise, a unmarried sheet of paper can be reused 1,000 instances before it wishes to be replaced.
What's the capture? A unmarried PrePeat printer charges nearly $6,000, even as a p.C. Of one,000 sheets of paper costs more than $three,three hundred. If you are going for walks a printing-in depth commercial enterprise, you is probably able to recoup your investment through the years. But the common PC consumer in all likelihood won't be willing to shell out that kind of money to replace a standard printe
No comments:
Post a Comment